| Well what can we
say? It is that time of year again when we bring to the floor the
changes we feel are needed, to make this an even better league. All I
ask from each of you is to read the first section of our constitution,
after you have read this.
Realism is difficult to reproduce when variables are
changed. Or when variables are not changed all the way across the board.
Players are all limited to games. Those who have fewer than 3.1 plate
appearances per game played, are also limited to at-bats. Starters are
limited to starts, relievers to innings. Yet, starter-relievers are
limited to games started and appearances to go along with innings. I
believe a few changes could have a great impact.
So what are my bright ideas? Nothing that has never been
discussed or proposed before: First lets start with the starters, limit
them to 1.1 times innings pitched. That is an increase of 10 innings per
100. Not a lot, but enough to cover the innings needed for a season.
Second, change the down by three runs a pitcher can be pulled prior to
the 5th inning and starter must face one batter in the 5th. Forcing
starters to complete five innings unless they have gone over the run
rule or have given up five runs, or are a 5- inning pitcher and have
been dotted. Also bringing the run rule down to eight would help improve
realism. Final suggestions on starters, four days rest unless strat
rates them with an asterisk. Days off can be added to the schedule to
even out the number of days off.
For relievers, here, we have a major flaw. I believe
there are two ways to achieve a more realistic usage. One would be to
limit relievers to 1.1 times appearances. The other way would be to
apply a rule stating relievers can only throw two consecutive days and
are not eligible to pitch three consecutive days. If a reliever throws
in both games of a double hitter he cannot throw again until he has had
a day off. I will now step-down from my soapbox.
Starter/relievers are handled perfect. Here a manager has
many options on usage based on that teams need.
Now let’s move to a more interesting subject, the DL. In
real life sometimes we get a real blow. A star player is lost for a
period of time. In our league, you may loose a player for 5 games. What
do you do? Send him down for 5 games and bring up a card. Major league
managers do not have that option, why do we? What we have now is
horrible. We should either create a DL that makes sense… Causing a
player to miss at least 10 games, 12 would be more realistic. Or get rid
of injuries. The changes needed here could be done simply by adding one
or two more groups; and changing the lengths of injuries. Set the DL at
a minimum of 10 or 12 games. A manager would have to decide what to do
if a player has a five or six game injury; keep him up with one less
able body for those games or place him on the DL.
Also I am against inter-league play. It is difficult
enough for our season to end on time. This has never changed and will
never change. Let’s say I have a chance to play team A, I know I can
play 5 or 6 games with them. Or I could play team N for 4 games. Four
games is a waist of my time when you add in travel and compiling stats.
This I give a maximum of two years before it is voted out, let’s save
ourselves some time and trouble and tank it now!
Ballparks could be great if strat did not over do the HR
and Ballpark HR. When a hitter has twice as many homer points as base
hit… but only hit half as many homers as base hits…. I’ll say no more.
Final point, cut back to a 15 round draft.
Well, there you have it. Myself, I feel very strong about
the pitching issues and have begun to consider changing to the NL. We
have restrictions for pitchers in the post season, why not the regular
season.
Oh crap my box caved in :-). Please consider these issues
and again read the first part of the constitution. If that is not the
spirit wanted then we should remove that part from the constitution.
Thank You
jgl
|